Seeking a bottom for an entire economic cycle: Don Pittis
Must we suffer the painful changes of capitulation for recovery?
As oil concluded a bad week with a plunge of nearly $2 a barrel on Friday, it seems pretty clear that something's got to give.
"Everyone was assuming that Russia and/or the North Sea or somewhere — some of these mature basins — would have seen dramatic declines [in production] because of those low oil prices," said Citigroup's top energy analyst Seth Kleinman in a recent interview. But it hasn't happened yet.
Stock traders sometimes talk about capitulation, a moment when markets give up all hope of recovery and finally collapse. As oil, stock markets, the loonie and perhaps the entire world economy, tumble from low to new low, it may be that we need to see real signs of surrender before the world can bounce back again.
- Canadian dollar dips below 69 cents US as oil resumes slide
- Asian markets slide in 'another immensely volatile week'
In his book The Upside of Down Canadian author Thomas Homer-Dixon describes something he calls catagenesis, where "catastrophe is followed by creativity and eventual renewal."
Cleansing fire
In his book Homer-Dixon must have captured a mood. He published it in 2007 as if anticipating the great market meltdown from which the world is still struggling to recover.
But at the time it appeared Homer-Dixon was wrong. Rather than a crumbling followed by renewal, the world's governments merely flooded the market with more money, keeping the old system running. There was no catagenesis because there was no catastrophe.
With so many opinions in this wide world, inevitably there are those who are impatient for the Marxist crisis of capitalism that will bring us into a new world order. Those who read history and understand the destructive power of previous economic and social breakdowns are less likely to wish for a new one.
The current market for oil is a less portentous example that helps to illustrate the economic pressures that come to bear.
Blinking last
In developed countries, including Canada, private companies also continue to produce even after the price they earn is less than the cost of production.
As Kleinman points out, Russian oil production finished the year at an all-time high. All we have seen so far is a slight cutback in U.S. shale drilling. At the same time, Kleinman says, emerging markets such as Brazil that drove the oil and commodities boom as they consumed more and more are now shrinking, meaning that demand has declined even as production has grown.
Each oil producer is betting that one of the others will crack first. As in a war, every country and every company hangs on until they reach a crisis point. In a country, perhaps it will be a moment of social collapse. In the case of companies, it will be the final moment when company managers and their bankers just cannot justify continuing.
Hitting bottom
Unlike economies ended by war or cities destroyed by fire, market capitulation is not so extreme.
New York's Dow Jones index and the TSX were down hundreds of points on Friday. No one seems quite sure when it will stop. The price of houses in Calgary is looking for a bottom. So is the loonie, which is dependent, at least partially, on the value of oil and copper, which depend on when China hits bottom.
In market lore, capitulation is a good thing. Companies have been forced by necessity to cut costs. Some have gone broke. Capitulation, if you can recognize it, is when all the bad news has been priced in and markets can begin to rise again.
In the wider global economy, there may be problems that have not yet been solved that still require the pressure of necessity to force governments into unpalatable action.
No one wants to sell their house for less than they think it's worth. No one voluntarily asks for their buying power to shrink. No one wants to pay higher taxes. Sometimes it is only the cruelty of recessions and capitulation that forces us to make painful change.
Follow Don on Twitter @don_pittis
More analysis by Don Pittis
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
