Edmonton

Sexually inappropriate 'call sign' leads to guilty verdict, reprimand for 2 military officers

Charges and disciplinary actions stem from an informal meeting known as a "call sign review board" on June 22 at one of Canada's two main fighter jet bases, 4 Wing Cold Lake in Alberta.

Fighter pilots assigned the military nickname during informal meeting in June

A Canadian Armed Forces CF-18 fighter jet taxis after landing in Kuwait in 2014. Two military officers have been handed reprimands and minor suspensions of pay for failing to enforce the military's orders on preventing and addressing sexual misconduct. (DND, Handout/Canadian Press)

The Royal Canadian Air Force says two military officers have been handed reprimands and minor suspensions of pay for failing to enforce the military's orders on preventing and addressing sexual misconduct.

The charges and disciplinary actions stem from an informal meeting known as a "call sign review board" on June 22 at one of Canada's two main fighter jet bases, 4 Wing Cold Lake in Alberta.

Former fighter pilots have described such review boards as informal meetings after major training exercises or operations in which pilots assign nicknames, or call signs, to newer members over drinks.

The Air Force says that during the meeting in June, several fighter pilots proposed, discussed and assigned an "inappropriate" call sign for another pilot.

Senior Air Force officers Col. Colin Marks and Lt.-Col. Corey Mask each faced one charge of failing to effectively carry out their responsibilities. 

Marks is being deprived of eight days of pay after his guilty verdict at a summary hearing, and Lt.-Col. Corey Mask is losing five days of pay.

The Air Force says in a statement that the decisions did not mark the end of the matter, as a broader cultural shift is underway.

The case against Marks and Mask casts a spotlight on a long-standing tradition in Canada's military of assigning call signs at a time when the military is still dealing with the fallout from a rash of inappropriate — and in some cases criminal — behaviour by senior officers.

Call-sign reviews to be formalized

The message shared by Air Force spokesman Maj. Trevor Reid described the summary hearings, which took place in front of 50 members of 4 Wing, as a "non-penal and non-criminal process used to fairly address breaches of military discipline at a unit level."

The statement, sent to Air Force members, said it must learn from the incident "in order to further evolve our culture into one of absolute respect, where each of us can bring our best selves to the operation and organization every day."

It added that the Air Force "is taking measures to formalize the tradition of call-sign review boards to provide proper oversight, and ensure they are conducted in a manner that is in line with the Air Force's values."

Air Force commander Lt.-Gen. Eric Kenny had first revealed an investigation into the June 22 meeting when he announced in August that a ceremony to install Marks as commander of Canada's other fighter jet base, 3 Wing in Bagotville, Que., was being delayed.

Both officers were charged in October, but news of the charges and summary trials were only revealed late last month.

The charges were not criminal in nature, and their hearings were conducted by other officers in Cold Lake, Alta., who the Air Force said were distant enough to "ensure impartiality in the decisions rendered." Neither hearing was open to the public.

A third, more junior officer was also charged with undermining discipline or morale for what the Air Force has said was participating in the assignment of an "inappropriate call sign."

The charge against that officer, whose name has not been released, was later dropped and the officer instead received what the military calls administrative measures.

Administrative measures, which typically involve warnings and reprimands, have also been imposed other officers ranging in rank from second lieutenant to major, Reid said.