Let's come together, not stand apart, 1 year after the Quebec City mosque shooting
Is designating Jan. 29 a special day to combat Islamophobia the best way forward?
Jan. 29 will be the first anniversary of the Quebec City mosque shooting.
On that fateful night, six Muslim worshippers in the mosque were killed, and another 19 injured.
Alexandre Bissonnette, 27, is charged with six counts of first-degree murder and six counts of attempted murder in relation to the attack.
Both the prime minister and the premier of Quebec referred to this as a terrorist attack. Students who knew him said Bissonnette had far-right views.
The deceased were Ibrahima Barry, 39, Mamadou Tanou Barry, 42, Khaled Belkacemi, 60, Aboubaker Thabti, 44, Abdelkrim Hassane, 41, and Azzedine Soufiane, 57.
- Six dead, 1 arrested and a province in mourning following Quebec City mosque shooting
- Quebec City mosque attack suspect Alexandre Bissonnette charged with 6 counts of 1st-degree murder
This tragedy shook Canadians, especially Muslims, to the core. It further fuelled a national discussion about Islamophobia.
In March, the House of Commons passed Motion 103, which called for a systematic study of racism and discrimination, including Islamophobia.
The motion did not receive support from all parties. The term "Islamophobia" did not sit well with those on the right of the political spectrum.
- House of Commons passes anti-Islamophobia motion
- Why accused in Quebec City mosque shooting isn't likely to face terrorism charges
The hatred faced by Canadian Muslims still is not validated by all mainstream politicians, and as a result, Canadian Muslims find themselves the fodder of political bickering. In fact, prosecutors in Quebec have decided not to charge Bissonette with any terrorism-related charges.
Islamophobia is real. I know it from first-hand experiences and from my work in the Muslim community.
The term is controversial because some people want it to be. It has, however, become the functional term when describing anti-Muslim bias, resentment or discrimination.
However, is designating Jan. 29 a special day to combat Islamophobia the best way forward?
Spiritually, the Qur'an counsels us to acknowledge that ultimately, we "belong to God and to Him is our return." This principle has empowered Muslims to deal with tragedies, large and small, public and private, throughout their history.
Tragedies are painful and difficult, but are also opportunities for growth and learning.
Practically, Islamic tradition does not seek to memorialize tragedy and loss, but it rather seeks to help people draw lessons and move on with their lives. This is exemplified by the brief period of mourning and the encouragement towards quick burial.
Do we want families who suffered such a devastating loss to relive this painful memory every year?
We should also avoid a racialized view of our community. Canadian Muslims are a broad and diverse faith community, inclusive of many ethnicities and cultures, with values, concerns and aspirations that intersect with those of many other Canadians.
Muslims have a duty to work with other Canadians to deal with the reality of increased racism in our country and focus on healing those who have suffered from it for generations. This is the Islamic ethos, which calls Muslims to be "with the people," not distinct from them.
By seeking government designation for Jan. 29 as a day against Islamophobia, we are seeking official validation and recognition of our pain and suffering.
This may help create awareness and understanding, but it also may play into the pretense of diversity that awards to each their day of action or their awareness month, while largely maintaining the societal structures and currents that make us feel these days are needed in the first place.
This is what we need: grassroots efforts to organically connect communities and citizens, so that when tragedy hits any one group, Canadians can embody the vision of community described in the Islamic spiritual tradition "as one body; when one limb hurts, the whole body reacts with sleeplessness and fever."
This column is part of CBC's Opinion section. For more information about this section, please read this editor's blog and our FAQ.