Jacques Parizeau sometimes made life difficult for other PQ leaders
Jacques Parizeau was never hesitant to criticize his party and the leaders who succeeded him
Former premier Jacques Parizeau is being praised by many federalists as a worthy adversary and a formidable opponent in the historic battles over Quebec sovereignty. But through the years Parizeau proved to be an equally irksome thorn in the side of many of his allies within the Parti Québécois.
Parizeau had a singular vision of how Quebec sovereignty should be achieved and he was never shy to share it, regardless of who was in charge.
He seemed to have a way of popping up with a column, a comment, or an opinion expressed at the worst possible time for other PQ leaders.
Parizeau v. Lévesque
Parizeau, up until then Lévesque's finance minister, was not happy with the strategy. He and several other ministers resigned from cabinet in protest. The resignations surprised Lévesque, who resigned himself soon afterwards.
Parizeau would eventually return to politics. Lévesque never did.
Parizeau v. Bouchard
As leader of the Bloc Quebecois during the referendum campaign, the charismatic Bouchard tended to overshadow Parizeau. But once Bouchard became premier, Parizeau was quick to criticize his government, suggesting that it was not doing enough to continue to pursue sovereignty.
Bouchard retired in 2001, citing in part his failure to reignite enthusiasm for sovereignty.
Parizeau v. Landry
Charest questioned Landry on a speech Parizeau had made a few days earlier in Shawinigan, in which he was reported to have called for another referendum soon, and to have reiterated his infamous comments about the 1995 referendum loss being because of "money and the ethnic vote". Landry seemed unaware of the speech, and Charest hammered him.
"Quebecers don't want a government that divides them," Charest said. "On April 14, I will seek to unite Quebecers, not divide them like Jacques Parizeau has done. If you have principles, you will call Mr. Parizeau to order immediately," Charest barked at Landry.
The attack gave Charest momentum, and Landry never recovered. Charest's Liberals went on to win a majority government. Two years later, Landry resigned as leader.
Parizeau v. Marois
Shortly after the charter proposal was released, Parizeau attacked the idea in a column in the Journal de Montréal.
In the column, Parizeau wrote that the separation of church and state in Quebec has long since been established, thanks to the Quiet Revolution in the 1960s.
He accused the Quebec government of reacting to a growing fear of Islam.
"For the most part, the only contact that most Quebecers have with the world of Islam is through these images of violence, repeated over and over: wars, riots, bombs, the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Boston marathon ... The reaction is obvious: We'll have none of that here!" Parizeau wrote.
He said that kind of approach solved nothing.
The column prompted federal Liberal leader Justin Trudeau to remark "I think when Mr. Parizeau becomes a voice of moderation in the debate, the sovereigntists have a real problem."
Marois went on to suffer a humiliating election defeat the following spring, in part due to controversy over the charter. She resigned as PQ leader on election night.
Parizeau v. Péladeau
Parizeau said he hardly recognized the PQ anymore.
"We've gradually demolished this party, and we made it lose its soul," Parizeau said.
A large part of the problem, Parizeau said, is that it seemed PQ members "don't believe in themselves. So how do you expect people to believe in them?"
Parizeau said the PQ had lost its momentum because of constant "Byzantine" debates regarding the best time to call an independence referendum.
It was not by any means a direct attack on Péladeau, but it certainly leaves the current PQ leader with difficult questions to answer as sovereigntists mourn Parizeau.
Even in death, it seems Parizeau remains an obstinate, opinionated and confounding figure for his opponents and allies alike.