Windsor

Experts warn of Bill C-2 as 'anti-refugee' and 'anti-immigrant' giving Canada 'unchecked powers' like the U.S.

Experts and community groups working with newcomers in Canada are calling the Liberal government’s sweeping new legislation, Bill C-2 or the Strong Borders Act, “anti-immigrant and anti-refugee” hoping the legislation is not voted on to become law.

Bill C-2 gives power to pause, cancel and suspend immigration documents

Two young dark haired, cleanshaven men walk on a city street, with dozens of others shown in the background. One holds a sign that says 'Deport Hate, not People.'
Demonstrators rally for immigration reform in the US. Critics say Canada's new Bill C-2 or the Strong Borders Act very much emulates American immigration policies. (Damian Dovarganes/The Associated Press)

Mbonisi Zikhali came to Canada in 2009 from Zimbabwe to pursue a master's in journalism at Carleton University. Post-graduation, the international student found himself homeless in Windsor and applied for refugee status – a privilege soon unavailable if Bill C-2 becomes the law.

"The bill is unnecessary and not sympathetic at all to people's well-being," Zikhali said.

Many experts and community groups working with newcomers in Canada agree.

They are calling the Liberal government's sweeping new legislation, Bill C-2 or the Strong Borders Act, "anti-immigrant and anti-refugee," and say they  hoping the legislation does not become law.

A man in a blue vest.
Mbonisi Zikhali, a former refugee, says Bill C-2 will be traumatizing for genuine vulnerable people if it becomes the law (Submitted by Mbonisi Zikhali )

Zikhali said he came on scholarship and in 2012 found himself in Windsor picking tomatoes at a greenhouse. Soon enough, he was living on the streets, and lost his passport which also had his study permit in it. Applying for refugee status, Zikhali said, was his saving grace and worries this bill will deprive vulnerable people of a safe haven.

What is Bill C-2?

The legislation proposes changes to a number of laws including the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.  

Specifically it allows officials to cancel, suspend or change immigration documents immediately, pause the acceptance of new applications and cancel applications already in process if deemed in the public interest. 

Critics say new border legislation aligns Canada's immigration system with the U.S.

2 days ago
Duration 2:43
The Liberal government proposed new border legislation this week. But critics say they worry the law will do more harm than good. The CBC's Pratyush Dayal reports.

Asylum claims would also have to be made within a year of entering the country, including for international students and temporary residents. 

Take this hypothetical: An Afghan international student who came to study here in July 2020. When the Taliban takes over in August 2021 and things become uncertain back home, that student could have applied for asylum. But with this bill, the one-year time period would have lapsed and they would be ineligible.

The immigration changes would also require irregular border crossers — people who enter Canada between official ports of entry — to make an asylum claim within 14 days of arriving in Canada.

Immigration Minister Lena Metlege Diab is defending the measures

"There's a lot of applications in the system. We need to act fairly, and treat people appropriately who really do need to claim asylum and who really do need to be protected to stay in Canada," Diab told CBC News.

"We need to be more efficient in doing that. At the same time, Canadians demand that we have a system that works for everyone."

'Very U.S.-like' bill: refugee help centre director says

Windsor's Matthew House gives refugees a place to live and helps them with resettlement. Mike Morency, the organization's executive director, says he worries this bill will put more vulnerable people at greater harm.

"It continues to align our immigration system with that of the United States," Morency said.

"Refugee claimants are not the problem. The one year-ban is a major concern for us. The other major concern for us is the ability of the government to declare an emergency and suspend applications. That one to me feels very U.S.-like."

A man against a house.
Mike Morency, executive director at Windsor's Matthew House, worries the bill will align the Canadian immigration system with that of the United States. He says it will put refugees at more harm's way. (Pratyush Dayal/CBC News)

Morency said he understands the government's will to try to cut back on international students and migrant workers making a refugee claim as a way to stay in Canada, but worries for people who have a legitimate need for protection being unfairly targeted.

"It also feels very much like a workaround to our commitment to the Geneva Convention. If the government wants to step out of the Geneva Convention, then then we need to do it with integrity and we need to approach the UN and say we're going to withdraw," he said.

Syed Hussan, spokesperson for the Migrant Rights Network, agrees saying the bill violates Canada's "most basic legal obligations" and is "immoral".

'Gives the government unchecked power to take away people's status': Migrant Rights Network

Hussan asserts the bill infringes upon Canada's legal commitments and ethical standards by granting the government excessive authority to cancel permits. 

"Every refugee gets to have the right to have their case heard. That's now being taken away," he said.

"Collectively it's a bill that gives the government unchecked power to take away people's status… This is an anti-immigrant and anti-refugee bill. It's illegal."

Without any ability for people to appeal or have their case individually heard, Hussan said, the bill allows the government to "make people undocumented or just throw people out of the country in the hundreds of thousands".

A bald man with glasses stands outside wearing a purple shirt.
Syed Hussan says the Migrant Rights Network condemns Bill C-2's anti-Refugee and mass deportation provisions. (CBC)

The changes also allow the federal immigration department to share information more widely with different agencies within Canada. Hussan said anyone who was not a citizen or later became a citizen will have their data impacted by the bill.

Hassan said this is similar to the US immigration policies.

"This is Carney's first test and he's failed it. He's no different from Donald Trump."

'Major rollback of rights,' 'disservice to refugees': Queen's university law professor

Sharry Aiken, professor of law at Queen's University, also finds the bill troubling.

"Very disappointing. It's a betrayal of many Canadians that supported this government in the most recent election," she said, noting these issues weren't part of the Liberal election campaign.

The omnibus bill, she said, is quite complicated with 16 different parts and neither serves to reform the asylum system nor address Canadians' privacy rights. 

Typically, omnibus bills don't get the degree of parliamentary scrutiny and oversight, she said, which is concerning. Aiken said the one year-bar for asylum claimants represents "a major rollback of rights". 

"No longer are these claimants eligible for a hearing before the Refugee Protection Division," she said.

The division of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRB) hears and decides claims for refugee protection in Canada.

A woman smiling.
Sharry Aiken, law professor at Queen's University, says the Bill C-2's one year rule mimics what's in place in the U.S. and worries that the bill will do a disservice to refugees. (Greg Black Photography)

Aikens said this "arbitrary" bill will also very quickly develop a backlog.

"The bill proposes a legislative fix for a problem that doesn't require new law. It requires operational intervention," she said.

"This one year rule mimics what's in place in the U.S. and what has been the subject of extensive international criticism… This bill does a disservice to refugees and betrays the Canadian public's trust in the Liberal government for ensuring a fair refugee determination system consistent with international standards."

She urges the MPs to separate out the provisions having the issues desegregated.

'Will make the process more cumbersome': immigration lawyer

Toronto-based immigration lawyer, Mario Bellissimo, said with the bill creating "arbitrary distinctions" of 14 days and one year after June 2020, "an individualized assessment" approach is being taken away.

While the number of refugee claimants have recently dipped, Bellissimo said the bill signals that Canada wants to potentially limit immigration. 

"It wants to send messages to individuals who want to traverse the system over many years without legitimate claims that this is not a destination of choice for you," he said.

A man in a suit.
Toronto-based lawyer Mario Bellissimo says the bill will make the immigration system more cumbersome than actually helping in resolving the backlog. (Submitted by Mario Bellissimo)

Bellissimo agrees that targeting individuals who impact the immigration system in a negative way is important but the bill will end up  targeting individuals in genuine need of assistance. 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Pratyush Dayal

Videojournalist

Pratyush Dayal covers climate change, immigration and race and gender issues among general news for CBC News in Windsor. Before that, he worked for three years at CBC News Saskatchewan. He has previously written for the Globe and Mail, the Vancouver Sun, and the Tyee. He holds a master's degree in journalism from UBC and can be reached at pratyush.dayal@cbc.ca

With files from Raffy Boudjikanian