First Nations leaders say Carney's C-5 summit sparks more concerns, questions
'Definitely it is not consultation,' says AFN regional chief about summit
Prime Minister Mark Carney promised First Nations rights-holders wealth and prosperity for "generations to come" at a summit Thursday designed to allay leaders' concerns about the government's major projects law, which has ignited criticism because it allows for fast-tracked approvals.
Carney's remarks drew mixed reviews from First Nations leaders in attendance, with some expressing tempered optimism and others panning the entire process.
"I'm leaving Ottawa with more concerns and more questions," said Gwii Lok'im Gibuu (Jesse Stoeppler) who is Gitxsan and deputy chief of Hagwilget Village Council in northern B.C., as he stood outside the meeting.
"I didn't have much faith in the process to begin with, and I'm leaving very concerned."
Angela Levasseur, chief of Nisichawayasihk Cree Nation in Manitoba, wasn't ready to dismiss the meeting as a failure, nor praise it as a success, calling it "a start."
"I'm not satisfied because once again, there's a lot of unfinished business that First Nations have with Canada," she said in response to the prime minister's speech.
The two-day summit at the Canadian Museum of History in Gatineau, Que., launched Wednesday afternoon and ends Thursday at 4 p.m. ET.
Carney said the law, known as Bill C-5 before its passage through Parliament in June, is designed to "connect and transform our national economy" at a time when the country is facing threats from U.S. President Donald Trump.
He said the potential benefits that come from building new railways, ports and energy "corridors" will flow to First Nations because "Indigenous economic growth is at the centre" of this new framework.
The regulatory structure will ensure big projects get "built in the right way" with adequate consultation of affected Indigenous communities, he said.
"Being a reliable partner to Indigenous Peoples goes beyond upholding the duty to consult — to enabling the creation of long-term wealth and prosperity for Indigenous Peoples through full equity ownership," Carney said, pointing to the Indigenous-owned Cedar liquefied natural gas (LNG) project in B.C. as something to emulate elsewhere.
"Canada's new government is committed to working together so that we can build Canada together for everyone's benefit," he said.
Still, Carney anticipated there will be criticism of the new law — something he said Thursday he's not willing to amend despite opposition.
"We recognize there are diverse perspectives, which is exactly why we invited a broad range of First Nations leadership to participate today," he said.
WATCH | AFN national chief wants 'firm commitments' from prime minister
Some in attendance bristled at the way the leaders were treated and considered walking out. Government officials maintained a tight grip on access to the summit, booting media from the room and then the building itself after Carney spoke.
Chiefs were asked to submit questions in advance, and when they arrived there was a list of questions on the tables for them to comment on. Some felt they were being talked at, not listened to.
"I thought to myself about packing up and leaving, because I'm saying this isn't anything like what I thought it would be," said Mohawk Council of Kahnawà:ke (MCK) Grand Chief Cody Diabo, who said he was leaving the summit more concerned than comforted.
Na'Moks (John Ridsdale), a hereditary chief of the Wet'suwet'en Nation, had a similar reaction: "You don't give people a script that they must stick to because you've already made a decision."
At one point a delegation of First Nations youth from northern Ontario arrived to protest against the legislation but they were met by an RCMP officer blocking their access to site. At the front of the group was 21-year-old Jeronimo Kataquapit, who has been setting up camps along the Attawapiskat River as an act of resistance.
"If we stand by and watch whoever come into our home and do whatever they want, then everything our ancestors have fought for up to this moment would have been for nothing," he told reporters as the group cheered.
C-5 sped through Parliament and was amended to require provincial consent for national projects, but the Senate voted down Mi'kmaw Sen. Paul Prosper's proposed provision to include free, prior and informed consent in the language of the bill.
"Our rights cannot be implemented or respected without us, in substance and in process," said Assembly of First Nations National Chief Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak at a news conference in Ottawa Wednesday.
"They cannot be respected after the fact."
Woodhouse said the over 600 First Nations from across the country have a diversity of opinion on the legislation and the summit should have occurred prior to the bill's passing.
She said she wants Carney to come to the table with meaningful amendments to Bill C-5 and solutions to the "$350-billion gap in infrastructure for First Nations kids in this country."
At the AFN news conference, Joanna Bernard from Madawaska Maliseet First Nation, AFN regional chief for New Brunswick, said Carney's summit isn't really consultation.
"They're coming in, they're putting up the agenda, they're deciding how this is going to proceed, but definitely it is not consultation. If it was we wouldn't be here, we would be running the agenda, and this is not the case today," said Bernard.
Carney has said Indigenous consultation is central to the major projects bill, but Indigenous leaders have said that's a difficult promise to trust without explicit amendments.
"Until an appropriate process founded in free, prior and informed consent is established between First Nations rights holders and the Crown, the Crown's legal obligations will not be met," said Woodhouse Nepinak.
"Chiefs have made it very clear that First Nation consent for major projects is not optional."
On Monday, nine First Nations in Ontario filed a legal challenge against Bill C-5, and an Ontario law, Bill 5. The First Nations want the court to find the two laws unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court has previously ruled First Nations have a right to be consulted on projects under Indigenous rights and title — but they do not have a final veto on if a project goes ahead.
This Saturday, Just Asking wants to know: With resource and infrastructure projects on the agenda, what questions do you have about the duty to consult with Indigenous communities? Fill out this form and send us your questions.
With files from J.P. Tasker, Julia Alevato, Edzi'u Loverin, Brett Forester