Pardons allow new start, applicants say
She sits staring uncomfortably into the television camera, but Nadine Reid is determined to tell her story.
"I'm already apprehensive about doing this interview with you because you don't know what people are thinking," said the 36-year-old single mother. "People could see this and say, 'Hey, you're the girl that was on CBC and we're not hiring you because you have a criminal record.'"
Getting a job has been tough, in large part because Reid has a criminal record for theft, for which she has not been pardoned.
It's a question that comes up on some job applications, which ask about "any charges for which you have not been pardoned," Reid said. "So it's a big deal. Not having a pardon is a big deal. My past is not my past."
Unwittingly, Reid and the other 4.2 million people in Canada who have criminal records have become the centre of a national debate over pardons. Specifically, the debate is about the cost of a pardon and who should pay it.
'Cost-recovery basis'
The Parole Board of Canada wants to raise the fee to obtain a pardon — to more than $600 from $150. Public Safety Minister Vic Toews says he supports the principle of making people pay the full cost.
"We believe that ordinary Canadians shouldn't be having to foot the bill for a criminal asking for pardon," he told reporters recently. "The criminal should be paying for those pardons on a cost-recovery basis."
But opponents of the heftier fees say the issue is about more than dollars and cents. Organizations that advocate for prisoners and businesses that help people process pardon applications, say most individuals applying for pardons live on low incomes, either collecting social assistance or working at minimum-wage jobs.
Paying almost an additional $500 is out of reach for many, the advocates argue.
Toews conceded that cost and the inability of some to pay are legitimate factors, which is why the Parole Board of Canada held public consultations in February.
Breaking the cycle
The first time she was charged with stealing, Reid was fined and served a sentence on weekends, which still allowed her to take care of her son. Then about five years later, she got caught again. By then, she was the mother of two boys and once again did her time on weekends.
She stole clothes, hats and running shoes for her sons.

But Reid knew she couldn't go on stealing. She had to break the habits that had dogged her since her teens, when theft landed her in group homes.
"Just the feeling of being so embarrassed and realizing that there's more to life than to keep going through the system. I had to break the cycle."
Reid enrolled in a business program and earned an accounting diploma. She vowed to get off social assistance and find work. But it's tough for someone with a criminal record to get a job, much less keep it, especially when the work involves handling finances and the crime for which you were charged was stealing.
Reid recalled working full time for a company where things went well and her boss liked her. Fortunately, the company didn't check her criminal history when she applied.
But then something happened at work, and management decided to do background checks on everyone, Reid said. Her past came back to "bite her in the butt,"