World

Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 searchers to get new sonar equipment

The deep-sea hunt for the missing Malaysia Airlines jetliner will likely include cutting-edge sonar equipment when it ramps up again in October after the stormy southern hemisphere winter has passed, the Australian search leader says.

Hunt for missing jet to resume in October, led by Australian search team

The Australian head of the team hunting for missing Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 says negotiations are underway to add a fourth ship carrying new sonar equipment when the search starts up again in October. (Bradley Darvill/Associated Press)

The deep-sea hunt for the missing Malaysia Airlines jetliner will likely include cutting-edge sonar equipment when it ramps up again in October after the stormy southern hemisphere winter has passed, the Australian head of the search team said Wednesday.

The Australian Transport Safety Bureau, which oversees the recovery operation on Malaysia's behalf, has been criticized by some deep-sea salvage experts for not choosing synthetic aperture sonar, or SAS, from the outset of the hunt for Flight 370 that began far off the west Australian coast in October last year.

With the standard side-scan sonar that has been used to scour half the search area so far, the sonar image of a seabed feature becomes less clear the farther it is away. With SAS, the sonar image remains sharp regardless of distance.

Martin Dolan, the bureau's chief commissioner, said negotiations are underway to hire SAS equipment to add to a fourth ship that would join the search in the coming months, with the aim of combing the entire 120,000-square kilometre search area in the Indian Ocean by the middle of next year.

Only two ships have continued the search through the harsh winter months using standard side-scan sonar.

"Our preference would be to get synthetic if we can, but we can make use of conventional side-scan," Dolan said.

This flaperon from the trailing edge of a Boeing 777 wing is believed to be from Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370, which disappeared March 8, 2014, with 239 people on board. (Lucas Marie/Associated Press)

"The advantage of synthetic is that you can get greater resolution, so it helps in those areas that require closer examination," he said.

Fugro Survey Pty. Ltd., the Dutch underwater survey company hired by Australia to search for the plane that vanished on March 8, 2014 with 239 people aboard, has defended its use of traditional side-scan sonar. Fugro search director Paul Kennedy has described SAS as developing technology with some questions about its reliability.

Critics fear that aircraft wreckage several hundred metres from traditional side-scan sonar transponders could be invisible. Fugro points to its success in March in finding a 19th century ship wreck more than 300 metres from a sonar transponder as proof that their equipment works.

The search for MH370 has covered more than 60,000 square kilometres of seabed, focusing on flat and featureless expanses where the expensive sonar equipment can be towed quickly with less risk of crashing into underwater mountains.

But the area includes holes that searchers describe as "data gaps due to shadows caused by geological features." These sonar shadows have been catalogued and will be searched later before any seabed is declared free of wreckage.

June or July completion

Dolan said starting in October, these shadows will be searched by an underwater drone equipped with a video camera. The so-called autonomous underwater vehicle has spent the southern-hemisphere winter at the Australian port city of Fremantle because it does not cope well with mountainous winter seas.

Dolan hopes SAS will also be used to search shadows. But even without SAS, he expects the search will be completed by June or July if wreckage is not found.

Senior government officials from Australia, Malaysia and China — which lost 153 Chinese citizens in the disaster — are to meet in Australia next month to discuss the future funding of the search.

So far, the underwater search has cost about $76 million ($80 million Australian), with the Australian and Malaysian governments splitting the cost. China refused in June a request to pay a third of it. 

Australia expects the search will cost the same amount in the fiscal year that started July 1, and hopes Malaysia will again pay half.